A beneficial. The relationship between recombination regularity and you can hereditary distance within the eukaryotes

E. (1952)

Jevons, Yards. P., and you can Parker, Meters. T. (1964). J. din. Road., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, I., and you may Nichols, A. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An excellent. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Meters. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you may Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. An effective., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Technology, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). In “The fresh Medical Base away from Treatments Annual Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College or university from London area, The fresh new Athlone Force, London area. Parker, Meters. T., Todinson, An effective. J. H., and you may Williams, R. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

New parasexual cycle and its use in hereditary analysis

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an excellent d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you can Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty-five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you can Asheshov, E. H . (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, An excellent. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and Wilson, J. B. (1958). In the morning.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc

Tarr, H. A beneficial. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. An effective. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you can Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you will Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., and you may Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Age., and Dowsett, L. Meters. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Genetic Study within the Micro-organisms DAVID A beneficial. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt We. Addition . eleven. Segregation as Proof Effortless Genetic Control . A. This new genetic approach to biology . B. The brand new detection from segregation . 111. The basis out of Genetic Mapping . B. New sequencing off loci into the a good linkage chart: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-construction . Elizabeth. Removal mapping . IV. Practical Hereditary Testing . An excellent. Prominence testing . Bplementation testing . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Data inside the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A good. Standard considerations . step one. dos. Tetrad investigation . B. Hereditary investigation in particular organisms step 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or any other “imperfect” fungus step three. Neurospora crassa . 4. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Studies inside the Prokaryotes . A good. General factors . step one. Virility brands and you may conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and co-transduction . step 3. Conversion process and co-conversion process cuatro. Non-selective studies .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Genetic research particularly organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric bacteria . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you can Ps. putida . step 3. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Other bacteria C. Specialized mapping measures independent away from recombination VII. Hereditary Analysis within the Worms A great. Standard factors . step one. Variety of widespread genomes 2. Bells and whistles away from malware family genes B. Genetic study in particular worms step 1. Bacteriophages 2. Animal viruses step three. Bush viruses VIII. Concluding Responses Recommendations .