Now you must macro variables which has the new variable names as well as the adjustable names

research classification; identity identity = 'Name Label' intercourse = 'Sex Label' ages = 'Age Label' height = 'Height Label' weight = 'Weight Label'; lay sashelp.class; run;
proc report studies=class; column ('Name Label' title) ('Sex Label' sex) ('Age Label' many years) ('Height Label' level) ('Weight Label' pounds); attrib _all_ label=" "; run;

Smarter possibly – however, first a great deal more really works: look for the new changeable labels and you can names away from both PROC Information efficiency or about dictionary dining tables, following perform a beneficial macro you to definitely generally brings the new Identity statement that you have.

proc sql noprint; select term, coalesce(title,name) on the :labels separated by ' ',:labels age='SASHELP' and you may memname='GAS' order because of the varnum; quit; %place &=names; %place &=labels;

Re: Demonstrating each other variable identity and you will variable name regarding the table heading Published 08-11-2022 In the morning (772 views) | Inside the react to xxformat_com

investigation class; lay sashelp.class; label identity = 'Name Label (NAME)' gender = 'Sex Name (SEX)' years = 'Age Label (AGE)' top = 'Height Title (HEIGHT)' weight = 'Weight Term (WEIGHT)' ; run;
proc statement studies=class; run;
study classification; put sashelp.class; label label = 'Name Label' intercourse = 'Sex Label' decades = 'Age Label' top = 'Height Label' lbs = 'Weight Label' ; run; proc transpose investigation=class(obs=0) out=names; var _all_; run; filename password temp; data names; length varnum 8 _name_ $thirty-two _label_ $256 ; place brands ; varnum+1; document code ; _label_=coalescec(_label_,_name_); _label_=catx(' ',_label_,cats('(',upcase(_name_),')')); lay 'label ' _name_ '=' _label_ :$price. ';'; run; 

Today often work on the newest made Name statements into the a document action or PROC DATASETS action to evolve new connected names.

1206 proc report studies=class ; 1207 %are password / source2; NOTE: %Is (peak 1) document Code was document . \#LN00063. 1208 +title Label ="Identity Label (NAME)" ; 1209 https://kissbrides.com/fr/mariees-allemandes/ +name Intercourse ="Gender Label (SEX)" ; 1210 +name Years ="Decades Identity (AGE)" ; 1211 +term Level ="Level Label (HEIGHT)" ; 1212 +term Pounds ="Weight Term (WEIGHT)" ; NOTE: %Were (peak step one) conclude. 1213 work at;

Re: Displaying one another variable label and you can varying term in the desk heading Printed 08-11-2022 In the morning (761 viewpoints) | From inside the reply to xxformat_com

research group; set sashelp.class; identity name = 'Name Label' intercourse = 'Sex Label' ages = 'Age Label' top = 'Height Label' lbs = 'Weight Label'; run; proc sql noprint; select catx(' ','("',identity,'"',identity,')') on the :heading e='WORK' and you may memname='CLASS'; quit; proc report data=class nowd; column &heading ; attrib _all_ label=" "; run; 

If you’d like the new name to exhibit the name then become the name in the identity and simply use the Identity while the the latest heading

Re: Demonstrating both changeable term and you may changeable identity regarding the dining table heading Printed 08-11-2022 Are (753 opinions) | Into the respond to xxformat_com

Studying others reactions, We today ponder if the question for you is: ideas on how to do that and so the varying name is constantly accompanied by the definition of Term; or you wanted something more standard in which discover genuine brands which can be unique of the fresh adjustable label.

Re: Demonstrating one another varying label and you will changeable label throughout the dining table heading Posted 08-11-2022 PM (704 opinions) | Inside respond to PaigeMiller

You may be correct. My personal fresh concern wasn’t on adding this new adjustable label within the brackets adopting the changeable. But it’s other fascinating approach for taking both variable identity and you will name, I had not thought about. I bring it because an excellent suggestion because makes the password white.

My genuine matter would be to get one line toward variable name plus one one to your changeable name without the need to speed up (we.e. versus studies _null_ or instead macro vocabulary).

If you would like the name to display the name up coming become title throughout the term and only make use of the Identity as brand new header

Re: Exhibiting both changeable title and you can variable label throughout the table header Released 08-11-2022 PM (701 viewpoints) | During the react to xxformat_com

wrote:You’re best. My personal brand spanking new concern was not from the including the fresh new changeable term inside the supports adopting the variable. However it is various other fascinating method for bringing each other adjustable identity and you will name, I hadn’t regarded as. I bring it since the a nice tip since it makes the password light.

My real question would be to get one row towards the varying title and something one to into changeable label without the need to speed up (i.age. as opposed to investigation _null_ or instead macro vocabulary).

Re: Showing both variable term and you can changeable title from the dining table heading Posted 08-11-2022 Was (792 viewpoints) | In react to xxformat_com published:

I must point out that your didn’t address my personal matter. Thereby absolutely nothing has been cleared up. Their fresh code took this new varying identity and you may appended the expression “Label” referring to now brand new term we want to use. Would be the fact everything you try inquiring doing, append the word “Label” following the varying identity, otherwise would you like to use the genuine varying names? Including, in SASHELP.Fuel where three of parameters regarding investigation lay has a tag attached to they, the latest varying CPRATIO possess name “Compression Ratio”, and so do you want “Compression Ratio” to arise in their PROC Report productivity or do you need “CPRATIO Term” to arise in their PROC Declaration output? Please get this clear.

You want a response versus macros and you will as opposed to Data _NULL_ – why? As to why reduce valid systems to discover the job done?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ACN: 613 134 375 ABN: 58 613 134 375 Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct