Background Belonging: Just how Stereotypical Signs Feeling Gender Involvement in Computer Science

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and you will Steele, C. Yards. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Jobs 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. An excellent., Montoya, A good. K., and Jiang, L. (2017). Why are Particular Base fields So much more Gender Healthy As opposed to others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and Hudson, L. (2013). The fresh Stereotypical Pc Researcher: Gendered media Representations since the a boundary in order to Introduction for ladies. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Opportunities 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Elizabeth., and you can Lo, L. (2013). Manage gender-technology Stereotypes Predict Science Personality and you may Technology Industry Desires Among Undergraduate Science Majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. sixteen (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende within the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und auch Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: College students when you look at the math, computer science, research and techology (STEM) fields . Recovered out-of

Diekman, A beneficial. B., Steinberg, M., Brownish, E. R., Belanger, An effective. L., and you may Clark, Age. K. (2017). A target Congruity Model of Role Entry, Involvement, and Exit: Skills Communal Goal Techniques during the Base Gender Openings. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, A. H., and you can Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Concept off Prejudice on Women Management. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.3.573

Eagly, A good. H., and you may Wood, W. (2012). “Social Role Principle,” in Guide off Ideas out-of Societal Mindset, Frequency II. Writers P. van Lange, A great. Kruglanski, and Elizabeth. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, A great. An excellent., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., and West, K. (2020). How Gender and you can Competition Stereotypes Change the Development of Students when you look at the STEM: Professors’ Biased Reviews away from Physics and you will Biology Post-Doctoral Individuals. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Journey, N. M., Hyde, J. S., and you may Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-national Activities away from Gender Variations in Math: An effective Meta-Study. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equivalence Bureau Cupboard Office (2017). Gender Equality White Paper (Sum Release. Tokyo, Japan: Light papers on gender equality 2017 . Recovered regarding

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A good., and you may Brooks, An effective. W. (2015)pared so you’re able to Guys, Female Evaluate Elite Creativity as the Just as Possible, but Quicker Trendy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. You S An effective. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Grey, J. A beneficial., and McN). New Neuropsychology away from Anxiety: An enquiry towards the Features of the friend System. Oxford: Oxford College Press .

Greenwald, Good. G., McGhee, D. Age., and Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Computing Private Differences in Implicit Knowledge: The fresh new Implicit Association Attempt. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.6.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you will Lee, C. Meters. (2003). Assessing this new Validity out of Mind Construal Balances. Humm Res 29 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, Meters. E., and you can Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: Insufficient Match Build. Category Processes. Intergroup Connections 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, An effective., Kano, K., Minamizaki, Good., McKay, Elizabeth., and you will Yokoyama, H. Meters. (2019). Parental Egalitarian Thinking towards the Gender Roles Connect with Arrangement with the Girls Delivering Base sphere on college from inside the Japan. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y gГјzel KГјba kadД±nlar., Minamizaki, An excellent., Kano, K., Inoue, A., McKay, E., and you will Yokoyama, H. Yards. (2020). Gender-biased Social Effect out-of Base industries, Centering on the new Dictate out-of Egalitarian Thinking to your Gender Jobs. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/2.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, Grams., Dukala, K., and Szastok, Yards. (2020). Brand new Stem Graduate: Just after Graduation, Anyone Currently Differ inside Jobs Outcomes, Attributions for achievement, and you can Wanted Jobs Features. J. Soc. Situations 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Meters. (2016). Social Differences in Survey Responding: Affairs and Understanding regarding Examination of Effect Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ACN: 613 134 375 ABN: 58 613 134 375 Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct